Lean Forward

MSNBC

My References,

my labels.

today.

Morning Joe,

Up with Chris Hayes,

and more.

Alex Witt...

[*Willie Geist

Morning Joe,

Daily Rundown,

Jansing & Co.,

Now w/Alex Wagner,

Andrea Mitchell,

News Nation, w/Tamron Hall,]

Martin Bashir,**

Dylan Ratigan,

Politics Nation, Rev. Al Sharpton,***

Chris Matthews,

The Ed Show, Ed Schultz,

Rachel Maddow,*

The Last Word, Lawrence O'Donnell,

Up, w/Chris Hayes*^

Weekends, w/Alex Witt

[*2-8-12 inserts/links and rearrangements, I have not asterisked all the additions

** "the Dickens" some say [!] (Newt'n Con Science?)

*** "no spin" but "doom and gloom"]

*^ Up w/ 4wo men

[!]= irony mark but link is the "Dickens"(a, b,c & x-y?)

Ground Zero & Logical Relativism?

[Please note that I stumbled upon this link 2-13-11 and believe it may have been held in draft]

OK, I will not expound upon whatever my headline means, except for this poll.
But have we learned anything from the Shirley Sherrod episode?
Others have a more nuanced stand, while Keith Olbermann attempts some perspective.
[Nuanced footnote: Grounds: Zero?. And yet, I can support* Harry Reid's statement, realizing he may know the difference which Republicans don't, basically like Chris Hayes does not support The National Review, but does not intend to ban it. It seems to hinge(or spin) on freedom and opportunity.
* I am using the word "support", which Hayes says is not the right word, but I use it in the Right's context. All words are nuanced or in context, which disconnects** many from the cause and effect of nature and progress, let alone values or taste.]
** note: emphasis bold links, and anachronism of last two

Heterodoxy

The Lawrence O'Donnell Show / Chris Hayes

Republicans are saying what Obama couldn't.

< previous post >

MSNBC

Lean Forward[!]

Morning Joe

The Cycle

Martin Bashir

All In w/ Chris Hayes

NBC News

The General Theory of Karl Rove

And The Relative Specialty*  of President Obama!





A.  The General Theory: Attack what works!

B.  The Theory of Special Relativity: Congress makes the laws!





The General Theory of Karl Rove: *Attack what works*. The Theory of Special Relativity of Obama. "Congress makes the laws, and he can't rein(or reign o'r) cats or dogs.* (partial translation: laws are a product of committee think) It is not surprising that it is difficulty reading and two courts can read it different.
...
And congress can Bane or...
---
Focus/Highlight: 2nd Video w/ Chris Hayes 
BTW: don't count on my physics but who knows?


*[Rough draft in progress.]
Q ED
6th edgy?


7-30-14
PARDON MY SPACIOUSNESS: WINDOWS/EXPLORER COMPATABILITY ANOMALY


Maslow's[?] woah.

Pare a digM, Pair a docs.

Vise verses** a ... vice versa ?
Paradigm ... Paradox
Who ran off with the clock ? *

* All In w/ WolfoWits.

** Hayes Godwins Wolfowitz
NSA Melts Partisan Divide. 

(FP) Neo K'antian

Rough notes.

Bernie/Who: for VP?
(some in mind) (Eaton/Webb?)

Think Progress '~' change status [~]

All in w/ Chris Hayes CJ reform*.
Pulse polls / statistics
Facebook / Fruit salad.

* /~/ BO COO

5-1-15
May Day ! ?

Contempt for Courage

President Obama is taking Congress(**B) and* Romney on head-on. 

Republicans are all about the politics of opposition.  Democrats are all about the politics of getting things done.(*B)  But there are limits, and they are in the constitution and the three branches of government.  Now that is not a very satisfying thing.  Congress makes the laws, and the president must follow them, and they will not change until they are broken.  Republicans will take the country down while the president has all the tools at his disposal to make sure they don't succeed.  Of course it is under the guise of a disagreement, but is a disguise that the people must see through. 

A look back** is called for because that is where not keeping the change will take us.  Has there not been enough change?  Well just asking the question reminds me of the last administrations Secretary of Defense and his questioning and answering*** himself.   I really don't want to go there.

But the recent Fed mention of the loss of wealth in the last 20 years, parallels the dine and dash that has been a Republican solution that has not been removed from the table.  Democrats have fought wars and built the middle-class, while Republicans have cut checks and unbalanced the nation.

Is the President doing as much as some would like?  As it becomes more clear that Republicans will not, now is the time that he must.

[Hardball "Two Americas" Walsh / Feerey - Romney is not on the ballot?  The Act Act.]

* 6-16-12  link moved back one word(bold added)(Also [Hardball] links)
("Romney" to "and")
** Ctrl F "bite"
*** Ctrl F "Rumsfeld"
(*B) Go jump in the Lakoff(i.e. Ctrl F Lakoff)(oops)
(**B) two links added @"taking Congress"& @Romney reinsert new link
(***B) NFRY & vice verse us (or chicken or egg*c)

[UP w/ Chris Hayes(***B) Stand Your Ground and De-Policing.]
Hint: v.c.(not very crispy)
*c literally

Change Logos

There were a couple issues that I seem to have been recently premptive** on, which Chris Hayes* seems to have intersected.  Actually in regard to changes, it was in regard to the tetrahedron.  Speaking of aster risks ...  I could work on mine.

Nevertheless here is the Awkward Tan / Gent***:

Facetious Replacement Logo:  The Washington UV's.  The Un-Vespuccians. 

In a related matter in line with Hume or ... !

 

*'n MSNBC
** to list later
*** (which I did not go All In with) /At least to the point of sharing on facebook.
[Last item was found on my desktop dated March 10th.]

... or whose? 

A New Draft

If corporations are people...*
i.e. I diverge:  The Gum Ball Theory?
KP PK

Regarding the prism** of history. ***


On the left we have the good cop. On the right we have the bad cop.
Too bad cops(or filibusters), aren't in the constitution, but they are metaphors for elements of progress.  ^  [There are three equal branches of government. On the left we have the Republican executive, on the right we have the Democratic leader.]
   

*pre-emptive syncratic process
The Divergence of Hardball
** compliments to and complement to David Gregory [11-26-13 Roger Simon]
^  OW  (Ted Cruz' Glass House) see Hardball.
Re:image- on the right the unified executive, on the left the constitutional O~B^^won.
[Bush/Cruz/Walker/Rubio? The pure pol?] ABC (anacronistically blogging culture)
^^ Remitt-flop (i.e. Congressional infinitive)
FP All In. Fear of Process.
Chris Hayes No chyron? This is what Democracy looks like.  Too diluted.
*** the big hint

, comma added , also Roger Simon link
[fair and balanced ? ]
The two Manicheans?

DBA

Chris Hayes is All In!

Debut(?) of All In ? 
To bracket my enthusiasm.

[live blogging ]
How's about CHinners?

Kant we get along...

...without going thru Hegel?
Or Knot without Hume or Mill?
Or put Decartes Be4 De-Horsemen.

Knot 2B a needle in a Hayes tack. 

2-3-14  update label Neo-con, Wolfowitz

Compromise is for losers!

In The Place for Politics, on MSNBC Thomas Roberts* reprises an old saying about compromise and "both sides" going away something.  The headline here is my reply***. 

* 3 good links** but not Thomas nor necessarily The^ Place.

Way Too Early

The Daily Rundown

Jansing & Co.

NOW with Alex Wagner

Andrea Mitchell Reports

NewsNation

Other Shows

The Cycle

Martin Bashir

UP w/ Chris Hayes

Melissa Harris-Perry

Weekends with Alex Witt

MSNBC Documentaries

 

** Top Stories Via First Read

*** not exactly (i.e. it is "politics")

(fn)

 ^ google is no help either (this was the latest I found)

Mitt Returns Wife's Gift

One might say it is politics,

but it is probably business.

But allow me an Etch-a-Sketch moment:

Ann Romney's gift was a re-gift of used analogy.

Ann claimed her gift from Hilary Rosen last week, but 3 months ago her husband used it up* on the campaign trail, when he claimed that stay-at-home moms lack "the dignity of work".

* Mitt would pay to deprive stay at home mom's this privilege.

[More on Romney "flexibility" versus President Obama's hot mic on Russia:

What I take away is that he will be a lot more "flexible" after they return to power. That way he won't have to oppose what Republicans have done to stand in the way of President Obama's plans for helping the country and the economy, not that they will not undo what he has done that has worked.

here.]

[The talk and what's up with Chris Hayes.]

[Speaking of flexibility.]

[RES PEC TRM-ONEY: I won't suggest the tune this be sung to.]

[Hide and Seek: Gaffers Tape and GOP Records.]

[Olly Olly Oxen Free: The Last Word ?]

Ear Rock, Ear Ron

Knee Cha [!]

Scissors

All In w/ Chris Hayes 
Obama on Hobby Lobby, Obama Cares and Don't"just say no". 
Bring it on, bring on a Bill.  Ironically, when it comes to the Affordable Care act, they claim he has exceeded his powers by making exemptions, when they want to undo the the whole act. 

Tall Ebb and Try Pod.

Taleb and Tri-pod.

Bingo: Hint scroll over
[Footnote: another Try Pod]

[If some have problems with the President, how would they handle even more heat from the kitchen.]
[For later digging: Clams or C-shells...but my original intent was in the context of the Halperin/Evans political/media calculus or shore.]

[7-6-11 Follow-up: Rachel Maddow*, Chris Matthews**, Chris Hayes***, Last Word?*4. Not Quite. Tax & Spend R.I.P.* 3:25 and 11:00 economic brick, Rube Goldberg(Frank Rich)
** Sen. McCaskill Joan Walsh
*** David Frum, Eugene Robinson (& David Brooks)
*4 Do Nothing Congress]

Lean Back

Anniversaries from "Unhistory".

4women: [under construction]

Or should I?

I won't get stuck on numbers, but this is an interesting tangent.

Passing the buck in "the culture war"?

One Million Moms claims there is a culture war.

How is one neutral in what is their war?

Mourning in America:***

for the Raw Money* Class?

It's half-time in America.

(RM** w/Chris Hayes)

*Thanks to Norman Goldman for Mint Raw Money, and a Thom Hartmann caller who wanted a new class label for the 1% if Romney is the nominee. Do we really want to go back to where we were in 2008?

**only a coincidence he is in for Rachel Maddow

*** they used to call it "doom and gloom"

[***B:(link added) I take it back, they doo doo irony! Talk about twisted bridge of rhetoric.]

[2-7-12 An Inconvenient Acronym: PU Action as opposed to just PU**^? Actually it is more*^ of an inconvenient blog search.]

*^ a,b,c

**^ Speaking of Bowls[?] (irony mark: a,b,c,d,e,)("parsed"=a+b)